Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »
Re: Apps
Communism will winCommunism will win 25 Feb 2021 01:36
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

flynncooklolflynncooklol writes:

Please make me a member of your site.

Any thoughts? They already have their own SCP-like site, so it shouldn't be too hard to check what their writing is like, but I'm otherwise occupied atm so if someone could report back that would be helpful. Default app + very few posts on their profile means we don't have a lot to work with, so unless their stuff is really good, I'm probably leaning towards decline.


if your reading this your gay

Re: Apps by Communism will winCommunism will win, 25 Feb 2021 01:36
Re: Apps
ultra_kekultra_kek 24 Feb 2021 05:47
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

I can't get any information on them so with only the knowledge that theyre an RPC member I'm also for declining.

Re: Apps by ultra_kekultra_kek, 24 Feb 2021 05:47
Re: Apps
ultra_kekultra_kek 24 Feb 2021 05:42
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

As for Mercy, i'm inclined to accept as they seem like a fine person.

Re: Apps by ultra_kekultra_kek, 24 Feb 2021 05:42
Re: Apps
ultra_kekultra_kek 24 Feb 2021 05:41
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

I looked for Agente Shuffle's social media accounts based on the information provided on their profile and found their twitter (@idmns) on which they seem to reblog many right-wing oriented, transphobic, racist, and anti-protest tweets, and an excessive amount of questionable (to put it very mildly) NSFW content. Even besides not thinking that any particular RPC member is deserving of such an easy assumption of innocence, I absolutely do not think that this is a person who should be allowed anywhere near this site.

Re: Apps by ultra_kekultra_kek, 24 Feb 2021 05:41
Re: Apps
WestrinWestrin 24 Feb 2021 04:31
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

Creating a separate post for the new apps cuz im lazy to address them separately

Agente ShuffleAgente Shuffle - I dont know much about them, but as stated previously, Im not that enthused to invite an RPC member. But if TradeHumour is right Im willing to look past that Nevermind. Voting no.

ResearcherMercyResearcherMercy - I vote yes for reasons others have said.

SomeoneXenoSomeoneXeno - Only a member of the RPC sandbox, unconvincing app, yeah thats enough for me to vote deny.


Only nerds have signatures

Re: Apps by WestrinWestrin, 24 Feb 2021 04:31
Re: Apps
Communism will winCommunism will win 24 Feb 2021 04:23
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

SomeoneXenoSomeoneXeno writes:

hi

They have a million sandboxes, no comments anywhere, and are only a member of the RPC Authority Sandbox. Unsurprisingly, I recommend against accepting.


if your reading this your gay

Re: Apps by Communism will winCommunism will win, 24 Feb 2021 04:23
Re: Apps
TradeHumorTradeHumor 23 Feb 2021 21:17
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

I see that there are some prejudices on Shuffle, and since I have known him for several months since I joined -ES I will try to clarify: he was a junior moderator on the Spanish branch and then retired due to various reasons; sometimes he is active on -INT publishing drawings and is the current creator of the new GRU-P Division logo. Personally, he has always shown himself to be an excellent user, open and available to anyone, never showing any behavior of a toxic nature. Consequently, I ask you to move beyond the fact that you sometimes switch to the RPC and to rethink your vote.

For Mercy IDK.


- TradeHumor

Re: Apps by TradeHumorTradeHumor, 23 Feb 2021 21:17
Re: Apps
ElunerazimElunerazim 23 Feb 2021 20:26
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

Echoing others- I could probably look past a perfunctory application or an RPC membership, but not both.

Mercy seems chill and I totally get where they're coming from- voting Yes for them.

Re: Apps by ElunerazimElunerazim, 23 Feb 2021 20:26
ElunerazimElunerazim 23 Feb 2021 20:21
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » theINTernationale

Hey just want to step in with my thoughts.

I've read this a couple times and everytime I think the same thing: this needs to rhyme. It has the kinda stilted speech of a Rhymezone Villanelle, but every time I expect it to back up its word choice it just keeps going with prose.

Seconding (fourthing?) deletion move.

by ElunerazimElunerazim, 23 Feb 2021 20:21
Re: Apps
etoisleetoisle 23 Feb 2021 19:48
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

concurring with this—mercy seems sweet enough and I’m not opposed


do my gay little computers make you mad? do they make you want to hurt me?

Re: Apps by etoisleetoisle, 23 Feb 2021 19:48
Re: Apps
VoidLadyVoidLady 23 Feb 2021 19:32
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

I say no to Shuffle, neutral-leaning-yes to Mercy. Mercy seems like a nice enough person, but again they aren't very active in their history.


I wish I could be a girl, and that way you'd wish I could be your girlfriend/boyfriend.

Re: Apps by VoidLadyVoidLady, 23 Feb 2021 19:32
Re: Apps
YellowISlolYellowISlol 23 Feb 2021 19:29
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

for shuffle i see rpc authority and inclined to vote against so i will.

researcher mercy seems trustworthy enough and their app was high quality. voting in favor.


~~~🐜Ant boi baby🐜~~~

Re: Apps by YellowISlolYellowISlol, 23 Feb 2021 19:29
Re: Apps
RallistonRalliston 23 Feb 2021 19:19
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

Agente ShuffleAgente Shuffle — even though I don't know any of their work, they are a member of the RPC Authority, which, well, does set some expectations for them. I'm personally inclined to say no, but if other people say yes I'm okay with them being here.

ResearcherMercyResearcherMercy — though looking from history it seems like they haven't written a lot nor have they been that much active, they seem like a nice person. I'm neutral, but in favor if other people support them.

Re: Apps by RallistonRalliston, 23 Feb 2021 19:19
Re: Apps
Communism will winCommunism will win 23 Feb 2021 19:13
in discussion The Chatter / The Commune » Apps

More apps!

Agente ShuffleAgente Shuffle writes:

let me in! LET ME IN! please (sorry if i send this twice, my internet connection is bad)

ResearcherMercyResearcherMercy writes:

Ello. I've been on the main wiki for a little while [subjective, but according to WikiDot, I've been there since 2016], but I almost never talk because- well, I'm new and I'd like somewhere where I can simply have a different environment. I'm interested in joining your wiki as a place where I would feel more comfortable sharing my stories, tales, and SCPs, building a slight name for myself, if you will. :) I enjoy the idea of a collective Wiki where people can all contribute their words. It seems like a good idea, I hope I am accepted and I can grow a name for myself on your Wiki- if not, that's fine as well. Have an amazing day.

Any thoughts on these two?


if your reading this your gay

Re: Apps by Communism will winCommunism will win, 23 Feb 2021 19:13

Given that multiple people have expressed their disapproval for this article, by the rules we established back in November, it may now be considered for deletion. For convenience, here are those rules:

  1. A page will be considered for deletion if its reception, as determined by its comments section, is mostly negative. Users will be given time to discuss this matter.
  2. If someone other than the author(s) states that they want the page to remain on the site, it will not be eligible for deletion.
  3. If no-one advocates for the page, it should be moved to the "deleted" category, re-tagged with "personal", and removed from the main page. Other ingoing links may be edited or removed as appropriate.

If anyone would like to see this article stay on the site, please reply below at some point within the next week. If no-one does so, it will be deleted as described above.

As always, any thoughts about the article — whether or not they pertain to deletion — are welcome.


if your reading this your gay

Potential deletion by Communism will winCommunism will win, 22 Feb 2021 07:22
Ellie3Ellie3 22 Feb 2021 02:30
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » theINTernationale

Agreed. I don't think I have anything to say that hasn't been said.

by Ellie3Ellie3, 22 Feb 2021 02:30
etoisleetoisle 22 Feb 2021 01:51
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » theINTernationale

agreed, it’s kind of strange and hamfisted; besides that it just feels like a very uncomfortable/upsetting reminder to have around


do my gay little computers make you mad? do they make you want to hurt me?

by etoisleetoisle, 22 Feb 2021 01:51
WestrinWestrin 22 Feb 2021 01:19
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » theINTernationale

Agreed. Circumstances aside, this just doesn't really seem that good.


Only nerds have signatures

by WestrinWestrin, 22 Feb 2021 01:19

Now that I've actually gotten around to reading this, it's… honestly pretty corny, and the point it's making is strange too? And given the circumstances, it's kind of uncomfortable to have sitting around.


if your reading this your gay

by Communism will winCommunism will win, 22 Feb 2021 01:12

Well, it's been 36 hours, and we've all agreed that Harmony is no longer permitted on the site. Opinion seems split on whether that is forever or whether she will be allowed an appeal at some future date; given how stressful this has been for everyone, though, I think using language that puts this matter to rest is prudent.

The official verdict of this thread is that Harmony is not a member of the SCP Commune, and is not eligible for future membership.

If in the future we really feel the need to change this ruling, we can, but I don't expect that to happen for a long time, if ever.

I did also receive a PM from an anonymous site member prior to the 36 hour mark that I just saw now; here's the quote they wanted to provide to the thread:

" I firmly believe that she has done all but the initial request with perfectly rational bad faith, and that she will never change her aggression toward the SCP community at large, possibly even after the request is fulfilled. "

This user supported permanent revocation of her membership.


This thread will remain unlocked in case something else happens, but this matter is considered closed.


if your reading this your gay

page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License