I'm concurring with Westrin on this one. I like her, I just can't condone erratic behavior like this in an admin.
do my gay little computers make you mad? do they make you want to hurt me?
Recent Forum Posts
Imo it was my fault that Hylius reacted like that. I posted screenshot without her agreement, so it was rude on my part. Being xenophobic isn't right and wasn't required - If she had asked who shared her message, I would admit that was me. Also I wanted to apologize for that. I didn't want to insult her by showing her message to someone else - it was a joke.
I understand that sharing messages from server isn't okay, so I won't do that again. Also I've been warned by staff member of server where I posted that screenshot, so I'm all the more sorry about that situation.
Noting that this is my first time ever seeing Hylius, and we did not speak during the incident; this behavior is extremely inappropriate. Taking xenophobic pot shots at another user is inexcusably toxic, and makes the environment less accessible to everyone.
oneironaut🌙
If this was purely an isolated incident, I'd be much more willing to look past this and keep her onboard. Sadly, however, this isn't the case.
Hylius proves to be consistently conflictive and incomprehensible and constantly starts shit when there is no meaningful reason for there to be shit. This has happened off and on for as long as I've known her.
I like her, I genuinely think she's a good person, I just don't think she fits in here.
Only nerds have signatures
On May 20th, Hylius displayed behavior on the Commune's Discord server that I wish to discuss. I would have made this thread sooner, but Wikidot was experiencing an extended outage. Logs of the incident are available in HTML form here. To summarize the incident:
Since things have been slow around here, the thread will remain open to comment for two weeks, unless we reach a clear consensus before then. Hylius is also welcome to make her case here, if she so chooses. If she leaves the site before the thread's conclusion, it will remain open to determine what (if any) conditions would apply to her hypothetical return.
My personal opinion is that this mode of conflict resolution that has no place in this community. Attempting to unilaterally enforce perceived rules by playing mind games, while making others uncomfortable in the process, goes against the Commune's principles of honest discussion and community decision-making.
As such, I feel that Hylius is unfit to provide input on membership or policy decisions, and I recommend that her membership be revoked until an established user can vouch that she won't engage in this sort of behavior again. If you have any alternative suggestions for how to address this incident, or have any other input you wish to provide, please comment below.
if your reading this your gay
This is so silly. Your writing is so natural that it’s kind of beautiful underneath the comedy.
oneironaut🌙
Accepting FSA and ST, denying Nano.
… and for once, I'm getting to this fast enough that there aren't new apps to go over. Cool!
if your reading this your gay
Dogpiling on the above sentiment, Y/Y/N
Eschew elucidation, espouse obfuscation.
Accept for FSA and starch, they seem cool from the interactions I've had with them
Deny nano, their post history is suspect
Yes for Floor and Starch, Deny Dr Nano
Current location: Your House
abyss and starch are cool, abstaining on nano
how tf do I do css on this
YES: FLOORSUSPENDINGABYSS and Starch Tuber look nice enough and easy to get along.
NO: I think Dr_Nano1's posts indicate that they're immature.
春意看花难。西风留旧寒。
Accept, accept, deny. I trust Akumeoy's judgment and the first two apps look fine to me.
Agreed
Only nerds have signatures
Yes, Yes, Abstain.
Single: ❌
Taken: ❌
Gamer: ✅
email: moc.liamtoh|7891dogxes#moc.liamtoh|7891dogxes (Business Inquiries only)
FLOORSUSPENDINGABYSS writes:
Hey there. I'm not exactly new to the SCP community, but I'm new to contributing and I'd like a smaller, more experimental space I can occasionally check into. I don't know all of you personally, but I follow Akumeoy on Twitter and I've talked to etoile a few times, and this community seems pretty rad.
The app is good, and they seem pretty pleasant and thoughtful all around. In favor of accepting.
Starch Tuber writes:
Hi! I am an active user of the main SCP Wiki who has been writing in collaborative pages since August of last year and currently developing my first SCP Article. I like a lot of the articles in SCPCommune and I wanted to join to upvote, and maybe post my own stuff too on the event I don't feel confident enough that readers on the main site will like them. I have not joined any bigoted websites and I'll be glad to be a polite and helpful user in this community. Please consider my application!
My opinion of this is about the same as with FSA. Normal person with a good app. Accept imo.
Dr_Nano1 writes:
Please make me a member of your site.
The impression I get from their few posts is of someone who doesn't really know what they're doing. In the absence of anything positive to say, I'm recommending we deny.
if your reading this your gay
i664k is in, Cheese is in, Pierra is in. jonono got pretty mixed reception so they're denied.
if your reading this your gay
DrPierra and AgentCheese have posted work(s) on the Wanderer's Library so they seem fine to me.
Is i664k the new account of Zekia? They look fine as well.
Novote for jononono; can't vouch for them, but I feel a bit sympathetic. They seem longing for joining the site since they left LA for this?
春意看花难。西风留旧寒。
AgentCheese appears to be not really involved in much and generally harmless. I vote accept.
Stepping in to vote for DrPierra's admission, most of their comments seem reasonable and paying attention to details.
Abstain for the rest.
Eschew elucidation, espouse obfuscation.
i664k > if I join the wikidot, I might be nervous.
I think this is fair. Possibly underage though? I'm positive as of now.
AgentCheese Accept
jononono Deny
DrPierra Active on INT, probably some EFL in the way. Accept.
